In your entry explain the creative rationale behind the project name, logo, typography, tone of copy, imagery, graphic elements and treatments. In addition to the visual aesthetic share the brand positioning and copy narrative developed to connect with the target audience. Show examples of how the brand demonstrated a cohesive narrative through all promotional elements and communication platforms (print, website, social, ad campaign etc.). Identify the target audience, the brand positioning, key differentiators, main messages and visual brand identity and how these all contributed to the creation of a cohesive overall brand approach. If available, you may include a copy of the brand identity package or brand story book. (Maximum 1500 words)

IMPORTANT: Please include with this entry a copy of the creative assets to support the brand strategy.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept - Creativity - Graphic Cohesion - Strength of Brand Positioning Statement - Target market relevance

In your entry explain the creative rationale behind the project name, logo, typography, tone of copy, imagery, graphic elements and treatments. In addition to the visual aesthetic share the brand positioning and copy narrative developed to connect with the target audience. Show examples of how the brand demonstrated a cohesive narrative through all promotional elements and communication platforms (print, website, social, ad campaign etc.). Identify the target audience, the brand positioning, key differentiators, main messages and visual brand identity and how these all contributed to the creation of a cohesive overall brand approach. If available, you may include a copy of the brand identity package or brand story book. (Maximum 1500 words)

IMPORTANT: Please include with this submission a copy of the creative assets to support the brand strategy.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept - Creativity - Graphic Cohesion - Strength of Brand Positioning Statement - Target market relevance

In your entry share the content strategy and how it was seamlessly executed through a variety of social platforms including posts, stories, blogs and video. The submissions will be judged on the campaign’s ability to garner new followers, engage the intended target audience through shares, comments, reposts and conversation using a robust mix of social platforms and blog articles. Provide metrics to support the effectiveness of the campaign which can include impressions, engagement rate, and follower growth. (Maximum 1000 words)

IMPORTANT: Please provide URL link to the social channel or channel(s) to make the judging process easier.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept - Creativity - Layout and design - Copy and CTA - Effectiveness/results

In the your entry explain the brochure’s concept, its effectiveness/results, and provide any additional information about the brochure and how it meets the judging criteria. Digital brochures or flip books are permitted. (Maximum 600 words)

IMPORTANT: A physical copy of the brochure (if applicable) must be send to BILD before the submission deadline and reference your nomination number. If entering a digital brochure or flip book, please provide a URL where the brochure is seen online.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept - Creativity - Layout and design - Content - Effectiveness/results

 In your entry explain the brochure’s concept, its effectiveness/results, and provide any additional information about the brochure and how it meets the judging criteria. Digital brochures or flip books are permitted. (Maximum 500 words)

IMPORTANT: A physical copy of the brochure (if applicable) must be send to BILD before the submission deadline and reference your nomination number. If entering a digital brochure or flip book, please provide a URL where the brochure is seen online.

JUDGING CRITERIA Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept - Creativity - Layout and design - Content - Effectiveness/results

In the your entry explain the website’s concept, how the user experience was designed to optimize results and provide an intuitive web experience. Explain the overall goals of the website and how the design and navigation help to achieve the set-out objectives. Please expand on additional information about the website IE: For a landing page, how it contributed to the campaign conversion or engagement goals, a corporate site how it tells the corporate story and creates awareness, and for a project website, how it was built and designed to garner lead conversion. Include metrics and analytics such as number of registrations/leads, time on site, number of pages visited, weekly/monthly traffic numbers. (Maximum 1,000 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA
Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept and creativity - Navigation and ease of use - Design and visual appeal - Content - Results and analytics

This award recognizes the best short video, 45 seconds or longer, created to help sell a new residential or mixed-use development or a builders’ brand.

Entrants are to explain the concept and strategy for the video, quantifiable core business objectives and how their video performed against these objectives. They are to identify KPIs that prove that their video delivered impact. They are to provide any additional information about the video, including how it was appropriate for the target market and how it meets each of the judging criteria. 

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents).

Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Concept
• Creativity
• Content
• Target market relevance
• Response/results

In the your entry describe the concept behind the rendering, image composition and how it reflects architectural accuracy. Provide any additional information about the rendering and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept - Architectural accuracy - Contextual representation - Image composition - Visual appeal

Examples may be through the use of Social Influencers, a lifestyle event series, PR/Guerrila marketing tactics, media engagement etc. These events may use lifestyle experiences as an avenue to connect with their target audience and will undoubtedly reflect an innovative approach to a lead generation campaign. In the your entry explain the purpose, concept and strategy for the marketing initiative; describe what makes it innovative and unique; outline the initiative’s effectiveness/response/results; and provide any additional information about the innovation and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,000 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria: - Concept and creativity - Strategy - Uniqueness - Innovation and use of technology - Effectiveness/results

Print/Digital ads of any size and format (Facebook, Google Display, IG, Youtube, Twitter, Programmatic or other paid social channel), broadcast (radio and television) and out of home ads are eligible. This may include a series of ads that demonstrate the campaign advertising strategy.

The entry will be judged based on the brand continuity, ability to connect with the intended audience and impact of the ad’s messaging and call to action. In your entry explain the ad’s concept including the purpose of the ad, the rationale for ad placement, how the ad told a story and made the reader act. Support for the ad’s effectiveness may include campaign metrics such as ad placement, reach, time frame, CPA, # of impressions, conversions and any other information about the ad and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1000 words)

Questions:

• Describe the advertising campaign concept and strategy. (250 words)
• Explain the creative rationale behind the ad (or series of ads) and how supports the project’s brand and objectives (such as connecting with the audience). (350 words)
• Describe how the ad told a story and made the reader act. (250 words)
• Please provide your campaign metrics here (bullet point list). (150 words)
  

JUDGING CRITERIA
Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Concept
• Creativity
• Layout and design
• Copy and CTA
• Effectiveness/results

Required Information:

• Builder Company Name
• Contact Name, Email (for the entry) •
• Project Name
• Project Location (address, city) •
• Date Project Opened
• Website
• Target Market
• Budget
• Builder Logo
• Project Logo
• 6 images supporting your entry (i.e. print & digital ads) Note: these can be uploaded as PDFs, but Jpeg images are preferred.
• [optional] 9 additional images slots to support your entry
• Additional organizations to acknowledge
  

The winning campaign will be an example of excellence in integrated marketing and will demonstrate strong graphic language and brand cohesion, an engaging content strategy, a powerful lead generation campaign, immersive presentation centre experiences, appealing brochure storytelling etc.

To be eligible, campaign elements must have been submitted in at least three (3) other BILD Award marketing categories. In the entry explain the purpose, concept and strategy for the campaign; outline the campaign’s effectiveness/response/results; and provide any additional information about the campaign and how it meets the judging criteria. Show examples of a mix of media assets describing how the various marketing channels were effective both in the use of budget and ability to engage target audience. (Maximum 1,500 words)

Questions:

• Explain the purpose, concept and strategy for the campaign.(500 words)
• Outline and describe how a cohesive narrative through all promotional elements and communication platforms was achieved. (350 words)
• What made this campaign unique in the marketplace? (250 words)
• How did this campaign go above and beyond client expectations? (250 words)
• Please provide your campaign metrics here (bullet point list). (150 words)
  

JUDGING CRITERIA
Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions and supporting materials (images/documents). Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Strategy
• Concept
• Creativity
• Use of budget
• Effectiveness/results

Required Information:

• Builder Company Name
• Contact Name, Email (for the entry)
• Project Name • Project Location (address, city)
• Date Project Opened
• Website
• Target Market
• Budget
• Builder Logo
• Project Logo
• 6 images supporting your entry (ex: website, print & digital ads)
• [optional] 9 additional images slots to support your entry
• Additional organizations to acknowledge
  

In your entry explain the design of the suite, how it demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space, how it is unique and relevant to its target market; how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, if it increases choice for entry-level home buyers and the sales price of the unit. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Functionality
• Uniqueness of design
• Target market relevance
• Value

In your entry explain the design of the suite, how it demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space, what makes it unique and relevant to its target market; how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, and the sales price of the unit. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Functionality
• Uniqueness of design
• Target market relevance
• Value
  

In your entry box explain the design of the suite, how it is unique and innovative, demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space, how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, and/or addresses a unique demographic or specific needs in the marketplace, and the sales price of the unit. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Innovation
• Uniqueness of design and functionality
• Target market relevance
• Value
  

In your entry box explain how the suite demonstrates excellence in use of space and budget, describe the components and how they are successfully brought together to create a sales presentation that is relevant to the target market. (Maximum 500 words). Virtual model suites are permitted, provided they render the complete unit, including materials and furnishing descriptions (not a single room or component).

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space and budget
• Furnishing and accessories
• Materials and finishes
• Use of colour, texture and wall treatments
• Target market relevance
  

In your entry explain the concept behind the design; describe how it exemplifies creativity; outline how it optimizes its site and land area, compliments its surroundings and integrates into its neighbourhood; and provide information about its practicality and value for builders. (Maximum 1,200 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Site planning and use of land
• Creativity
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Aesthetic appeal
• Practicality and value

In your entry explain the concept behind the design; describe how it exemplifies creativity; outline how it optimizes its site and land area, compliments its surroundings and integrates into its neighbourhood; provide information about its practicality and value for builders. (Maximum 1,200 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Site planning and use of land
• Creativity
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Aesthetic appeal
• Practicality and value
  

In your entry explain the design of the house; how it demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space including lot frontage; how it is unique and relevant to its target market; and how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, include the sales price of the house. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Functionality
• Uniqueness of design
• Target market relevance
• Value
  

In your entry explain the design of the house; how it demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space including lot frontage; how it is unique and relevant to its target market; and how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, include the sales price of the house. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Functionality
• Uniqueness of design
• Target market relevance
• Value
  

In your entry explain the design of the house; how it demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space including lot frontage; how it is unique and relevant to its target market; and how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, include the sales price of the house. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Functionality
• Uniqueness of design
• Target market relevance
• Value
  

In your entry box explain the design of the house; how it is unique and innovative, how addresses a unique demographic or specific needs in the marketplace (for example: why it a choice for entry-level home buyers or specific homeowner needs); how it demonstrates excellence in functionality and use of space including lot frontage; and how it provides value to the homebuyer and builder, include the sales price of the house. (Maximum 500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Use of space
• Innovation
• Uniqueness of design and functionality
• Target market relevance
• Value
  

In your entry explain how the model home demonstrates excellence in use of space and budget, describe the components and how they are successfully brought together to create a model home that is relevant to the target market and how the model contributed to the sales success of the entire project. (Maximum 500 words). Virtual model homes are permitted, provided they render the complete home, including materials and furnishing descriptions (not a single room or component).

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses the questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

1. Use of space and budget
2. Exterior appeal
3. Furnishing and accessories
4. Use of colour, finishes, texture and wall treatments
5. Target market relevance
   

IMPORTANT: A floor plan of the presentation centre and its price per square foot must be included in the submission. Sales offices located in a room within a model home are not eligible for this award and should instead be submitted in the best model home/model suite category.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions.

Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Design and layout
• Customer experience
• Innovation and use of technology
• Use of budget - Results
  

JUDGING CRITERIA

Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Strategy
• Innovation
• Customer experience
• Commitment to continuous improvement
• Effectiveness/response/results
• 
  

Required Information:

• Builder Company Name
• Contact Name, Email (for the builder)
• Project Location (address, city)
• Date of Project
• Builder Logo
• Budget (if applicable)
• 1 required image
• [optional] 6 additional images slots to support your entry
• Additional organizations to acknowledge

Questions:

1. Describe the strategy behind your care program/initiative and what outcome(s) you hoped to achieve. (250 words)
2. How is this program innovative? What sets it apart from other customer care programs? (150 words)
3. Describe how the program/initiative enhanced/improved the customer experience. (250 words)
4. Describe how this program/initiative demonstrates the builder’s commitment to continuous improvement. (250 words)
5. Please provide any measurable results, metric here. (100 words)
   

In the description box explain how the individual demonstrates excellence in his/her field, leadership on a consistent basis, which may include a passion to fearlessly innovate within their industry sector, involvement in improving his or her profession, contributes to the industry and BILD, and is continuing Riley Brethour’s legacy with a PMA – Positive Mental Attitude. (Maximum 1,500 words)

CRITERIA

Entries will be judged on six criteria:

• Excellence in his/her field
• Exhibiting leadership on a consistent basis
• Involvement in improving his or her profession or industry sector
• Charitable/philanthropic activities and/or how the nominee is involved local community initiatives
• Contribution to the industry and BILD
• Continuing Riley Brethour’s legacy with a PMA
• Positive Mental Attitude
  

Applicants are conscious of the kind of impact they are having on all aspects of society including economic, social, and environmental and in the normal course of business, is operating in ways that enhance society and the environment. Applicants take active steps to minimize their environmental footprint and/or provide tangible societal and economic benefits beyond the confines of their enterprise and within the broader community.

In the description box describe the company’s or individual’s corporate social responsibility in the marketplace, in addition to any philanthropic activity or community work. Provide details of the CSR programs, such as community involvement and development, consumer issues, workplace and fair operating practices, environment practices, ethical sourcing and human rights. Describe the impacts of the program including any quantifiable metrics and provided details on how they influence others to do more for their community, demonstrate industry leadership, and how their efforts contribute to enhancing the reputation of the industry) (Maximum 2000 words) Supporting materials such as news clippings, website links, photos, and testimonials, may be submitted digitally.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to 6 questions.
Judges will review entries based on four criteria:

• Scope or Nature of the CSR program(s)
• Outcome or Impact on the community, environment
• Community involvement, philanthropy, partnership with NGOs or ability of the program to influence others to do more for their community/environment/etc.
• Demonstration of industry leadership/recognition of program by stakeholders/media
  

Applicants demonstrate philanthropy through financial or programming and demonstrate inclusivity for more robust and more diverse Canadian communities.

Applicants are conscious of the impact they are having in their communities, including support of immigrants by providing equal and active employment and integration opportunities, inspiring a philanthropic and community-building spirit in the ordinary course of business.

Applicants are encouraged to showcase how they have exhibited leadership in the communities they work in in the description box. For example, by developing specific recruitment programs for immigrants and/or contributing to activities within these communities. Supporting materials such as news clippings, website links, images, and testimonials, should be submitted digitally.

The award is dedicated to and named after Mr. Ignat Kaneff, Founder of Kaneff Group, who passed away in 2020. Mr. Kaneff’s life story was an extraordinary one but was, at its core, a quintessential Canadian immigrant success story. He founded Kaneff Construction in 1956, capitalizing on the post-war suburban housing boom, later expanding into high-rise tower construction and eventually into commercial property developments. He is credited with shaping Mississauga and Brampton’s downtown skylines through his signature iconic tall white towers built at breakneck speed in the 70s and 80s. His name is also widely recognized in the golf industry for having raised the standard of publicly available golf in the 90s with the opening of Lionhead Golf Club & Conference Centre. Iggy Kaneff’s real estate development legacy is matched only by his vast philanthropic deeds. In 1955, he pledged against his future earnings to donate $2,000 to the future Mississauga, the then-largest by an individual, sparking 65 years of a genuine and sustained commitment to philanthropy.

An exceptional quality was Mr. Kaneff’s ability to inspire, support, push and encourage those around him to reach higher and accomplish more. He genuinely cared about people’s life journeys.

Award entries will be reviewed by a special committee organized by BILD’s President and CEO, determining the successful recipient.

This award is made possible with the generous support of the Kaneff family, who values support of new Canadians. BILD and Kaneff hope this award will encourage industry-wide thought-leadership in hiring, training, and recruitment practices.

JUDGING CRITERIA
Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. Judges will review entries based on the following criteria: leadership within immigrant recruitment, talent development through growth opportunities, corporate culture, and philanthropic leadership.

Applicants stand by a zero-tolerance policy against discrimination, racism or oppression in any form in our industry, workplaces or jobsites. Applicants will be able to showcase their efforts by implementing DEI policies, procedures and/or programs. Specific DEI policies and procedures documentation must be provided as a part of the submission.

Applicants will be encouraged to describe how they have exhibited leadership in the communities that they work in. For example, by planning inclusive development projects, through inclusive marketing and advertising materials, developing DEI programs for their future residents and/or contributing to DEI activities within these communities. Supporting materials such as news clippings, website links, photos, and testimonials should be submitted digitally.

Additional consideration will be given to organizations that have exhibited DEI leadership within our industry by engaging in activities such as leading industry programs or educational/awareness events.

Award entries will be reviewed by BILD’s People and Culture Committee who will determine the successful recipient. The successful recipient will be awarded a donation in their name to a DEI charity selected by BILD’s People and Culture Committee. BILD hopes this award will encourage industry wide adoption of DEI initiatives, philosophies and values.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Judges will review entries based on the following criteria:

• the extent the company has improved their corporate culture by implementing DEI policies,
• how the company has shown DEI industry leadership,
• how the company has led leading industry programs or educational/awareness events, and
• to what extent the company has exhibited DEI leadership in the communities that they work in.
  

Applicants demonstrate the brave and adventurous spirit of Angelo DelZotto who stay true to a vision, or ‘just cause’, and continue to push through to success. These companies encourage and demonstrate an ongoing commitment and investment in innovation, recognizing that this also means accepting and learning from failure and the need to iterate. All areas of business and member types within our industry can apply. A company can base their entry on a specific product, process, design, etc. or on their overall approach to embedding innovation as part of their company culture.

Applicants can demonstrate their passion for innovation, in many forms, such as:

Material, product, technology (e.g. software, environmentally friendlier products/processes)

• Design & planning
• Construction (products or processes)
• Investing and financing
• Partnerships and collaboration (e.g. with local community groups or special local initiatives)
• Thought leadership (e.g. moving the industry forward to adopt new construction practices or policies)
• General Business

Applicants are encouraged to submit a written summary, photographs, and videos (optional) to support their entry. In addition to being assessed on whether a company’s innovations or product(s) are truly exceptional and transformative, and are having an active and positive impact on society, nominations are assessed based on the criteria below.

Award entries will be reviewed by a special committee, organized by BILD’s President and CEO, who will determine the successful recipient.

This award is made possible with the generous support of Tridel who encourages everyone to challenge the status quo like their founder Angelo DelZotto, who’s life was dedicated to being a change-maker for the greater good of the industry and society. BILD and Tridel hope this award will inspire industry wide curiosity and fearless innovation that improves peoples lives and sustains our planet.

(Maximum 2500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA
Entries will be evaluated on the responses to three levels of enquiry. Judges will access entries based on the company’s thought leadership on innovation (inspiration), extent of industry transformation, and impact.

In your entry explain the concept behind the project; describe its planning and design, how it optimizes its site and land area and integrates into its neighbourhood; identify how the project exemplifies excellence in quality and innovation; highlight the strengths of the project’s marketing and how it is relevant to its target market; outline the project’s effectiveness/response/results within its local market and provide any additional information about the project and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,500 words; up to 10 images and three logos)

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to six questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Planning and design
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Quality
• Innovation
• Marketing campaign and alignment with target market
• Effectiveness/response/results
  

In your entry explain the concept behind the project; describe its planning and design, how it optimizes its site and land area and integrates into its neighbourhood; identify how the project exemplifies excellence in quality and innovation; highlight the strengths of the project’s marketing and how it is relevant to its target market; outline the project’s effectiveness/response/results, including total units sold and the sales period; and provide any additional information about the project and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,500 words)

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to six questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Planning and design
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Quality
• Innovation
• Marketing campaign and alignment with target market
• Effectiveness/response/results

In your entry explain the concept behind the project; describe its planning and design, how it optimizes its site and land area and integrates into its neighbourhood; identify how the project exemplifies excellence in quality and innovation; highlight the strengths of the project’s marketing and how it is relevant to its target market; outline the project’s effectiveness/response/results, including total units sold and the sales period; and provide any additional information about the project and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to six questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Planning and design
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Quality
• Innovation
• Marketing campaign and alignment with target market
• Effectiveness/response/results
  

In your entry explain the concept behind the project and outline the key dates/milestones in its development; describe its planning and design, how it optimized its site and land area and integrated into its neighbourhood; identify how the project is a complete community through its mix of uses and its amenities; highlight the strengths of the community’s urban design, environmental, heritage preservation and architecture; and provide any additional information about the project and how it exemplified leadership in smart growth. (Maximum 1,500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Site planning and use of land
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Mix of uses and amenities/community spaces
• Environmental and heritage preservation
• Architecture
  

In your entry explain the concept behind the project; describe its planning and design, how it optimizes its site and land area and integrates into its neighbourhood; identify how the project is a complete community through its mix of uses and its amenities; highlight the strengths of the community’s environmental and heritage preservation and architecture; and provide any additional information about the project and how it exemplifies leadership in implementing the growth plan. (Maximum 1,500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Site planning and use of land
• Ground level and neighbourhood integration
• Mix of uses and amenities/community spaces
• Environmental and heritage preservation
• Architecture
  

In your entry describe how the company’s site planning, design and construction, demonstrates leadership in green building; identify how the company exemplifies sustainability excellence in resource management and innovation; highlight the company’s achievements in green marketing techniques/campaigns/partnership; and provide any additional information about the company and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Design and construction
• Innovation
• Site planning
• Resource management
• Green marketing techniques/campaigns/partnerships

In your entry describe how the company’s site planning, design and construction, demonstrates leadership in green building; identify how the company exemplifies sustainability excellence in resource management and innovation; highlight the company’s achievements in green marketing techniques/campaigns/partnership; and provide any additional information about the company and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,500 words)

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Design and construction
• Innovation
• Site planning
• Resource management
• Green marketing techniques/campaigns/partnerships

In your entry explain how the builder exemplifies excellence in design and construction quality, customer care and professional development of staff; outline the company’s contribution to the community, the industry and to BILD; and provide any additional information about the company and how it meets the judging criteria.

(Maximum 2,000 words) Performance in other categories may be considered when judging.

IMPORTANT: 50% of the score will be based on a survey of the builder’s purchasers. You will need to upload a Microsoft Excel file containing the e-mails, names and addresses of 100 recent new home purchasers from your various projects/locales within the last 3 years.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. When responding to questions, please upload any relevant supporting documents (ex: photos, customer care training, staff development documentation). Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Design and construction quality
• Customer care
• Professional development of staff
• Contribution to the community
• Contribution to the industry and BILD
  

In your entry explain how the builder exemplifies excellence in design and construction quality, customer care and professional development of staff; outline the company’s contribution to the community, the industry and to BILD; and provide any additional information about the company and how it meets the judging criteria. (Maximum 1,500 words)

Performance in other categories may be considered when judging.

IMPORTANT: 50% of the score will be based on a survey of the builder’s purchasers. You will need to upload a Microsoft Excel file containing the e-mails, names and addresses of 100 recent new home purchasers from your various projects/locales within the last 3 years.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Entries will be evaluated on the responses to five questions. When responding to questions, please upload any relevant supporting documents (ex: photos, customer care training, staff development documentation Judges will review entries based on five criteria:

• Design and construction quality
• Customer care
• Professional development of staff
• Contribution to the community
• Contribution to the industry and BILD